Re: Terrible performance on wide selects

Hannu Krosing kirjutas N, 23.01.2003 kell 12:11:

> make the pointer array incrementally for O(N) performance:
>
> i.e. for tuple with 100 cols, allocate an array of 100 pointers, plus
> keep count of how many are actually valid,

Additionally, this should also make repeted determining of NULL fields
faster - just put a NULL-pointer in and voila - no more bit-shifting and
AND-ing to find out if the field is null.

One has to watch the NULL bitmap on fist pass anyway.

> so the first call to get col[5] will fill first 5 positions in the array
> save said nr 5 and then access tuple[ptrarray[5]]
>
> next call to get col[75] will start form col[5] and fill up to col[75]
>
> next call to col[76] will start form col[75] and fill up to col[76]
>
> next call to col[60] will just get tuple[ptrarray[60]]
>
> the above description assumes 1-based non-C arrays ;)
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>