Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ODBC changes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ODBC changes
Date: 2001-05-02 05:30:31
Message-ID: 10421.988781431@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> I see my copy is 12,222 bytes on both linux and cygwin.
> I also heard from Eiji Tokuya that he sometimes(not always)
> saw corrupted win32.mak. Unfortunately I don't understand
> where the cause is.

$ cd /home/postgres/pgsql/src/interfaces/odbc
$ rm win32.mak
$ cvs update
cvs server: Updating .
U win32.mak
$ ls -l win32.mak
-rw-r--r--   1 postgres   users        12222 May  2 01:23 win32.mak
$ od -c win32.mak | head
0000000  \r  \n   #  \r  \n   #       F   i   l   e   :  \t  \t  \t   w
0000020   i   n   3   2   .   m   a   k  \r  \n   #  \r  \n   #       D
0000040   e   s   c   r   i   p   t   i   o   n   :  \t  \t   p   s   q
0000060   l   o   d   b   c       M   a   k   e   f   i   l   e       f
0000100   o   r       W   i   n   3   2   .  \r  \n   #  \r  \n   #
0000120   C   o   n   f   i   g   u   r   a   t   i   o   n   s   :  \t
0000140   D   e   b   u   g   ,       R   e   l   e   a   s   e   ,
0000160   M   u   l   t   i   b   y   t   e   D   e   b   u   g   ,
0000200   M   u   l   t   i   b   y   t   e   R   e   l   e   a   s   e
0000220  \r  \n   #       B   u   i   l   d       T   y   p   e   s   :

I see nothing debatable here: what is on the CVS server is a file
containing CR/LF newlines.  If you have something else then it's
been through a transfer process that altered the file.

The question to be discussed is whether that's the way to distribute
the file or not.  We can certainly remove the CRs if not.

BTW, by my count a Unix-newline version of this file would be 11736
bytes.  A 12708-byte file would be broken in some strange new way
(two LFs per newline, maybe?)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Matthew DormerDate: 2001-05-02 06:32:19
Subject: Writing Large Objects to Postgresql via ODBC using VB
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-05-02 05:18:47
Subject: Re: ODBC changes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group