Re: Which of the solution is better?

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Which of the solution is better?
Date: 2002-12-11 05:46:04
Message-ID: 1039585564.1265.38.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 23:20, Wei Weng wrote:
> I have two tables A and B where A is a huge table with thousands of rows, B
> is a small table with only a couple of entries.
>
> I want to do something like
>
> SELECT
> A.ID
> A.Name
> FROM
> A JOIN B ON (A.ID = B.ID)

How is this query any different from:
SELECT
A.ID,
A.Name
FROM
A,
B
WHERE
A.ID = B.ID

> And on the other hand I can have something like this
>
> SELECT
> A.ID
> A.Name
> FROM
> A
> WHERE
> A.ID IN (B_Id_List)
>
> B_Id_List is a string concatenation of B.ID. (ie, 1,2,3,4,5 ...)
>
> Which one is faster, more efficient?
>
> And if you could, which one is faster/more efficient under MS SQL Server 7?
> I am trying to develop a cross platform query, that is why I need to
> concern with performance under different databases.

--
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. mailto:ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| "My advice to you is to get married: If you find a good wife, |
| you will be happy; if not, you will become a philosopher." |
| Socrates |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-12-11 15:48:28 Re: Which of the solution is better?
Previous Message Wei Weng 2002-12-11 05:20:57 Which of the solution is better?