Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
Date: 2001-05-17 12:44:15
Message-ID: 10351.990103455@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Toward the end, I actually got approval from other JDBC developers
> before applying patches and people were still not happy.  Also, this was
> during feature freeze in February, not even in beta yet.

What?  beta1 came out the first week of December.  February would have
been beta4 or later.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-05-17 13:18:04
Subject: Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
Previous:From: Jonathan BartlettDate: 2001-05-17 12:06:48
Subject: syntax warning on

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group