Re: Catalogs Doc update

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Catalogs Doc update
Date: 2002-10-11 12:05:58
Message-ID: 1034337959.297.22.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 00:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> > - Mention that pg_database, pg_shadow, and pg_group are global, and the
> > rest are local to the specific DB. (I believe this is correct).
>
> This is already stated in the descriptions of those individual catalogs.
> I don't see the point of saying it redundantly elsewhere; that just adds
> another thing to have to maintain if we ever add more global catalogs.

How about the below then? I've been asked by a couple of MSSQL experts
why they couldn't see all databases contents in the system catalogs.
There was also a docnote about this, so I think it's worth mentioning
they're local.

'Most of the system catalogs are copied during database creation from
the template database, as such are database specific. Exceptions are
mentioned in the description of the individual catalog.'

--
Rod Taylor

Attachment Content-Type Size
catalog.patch text/x-patch 8.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Copeland 2002-10-11 13:30:55 Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-10-11 11:56:14 Re: .cvsignore file