Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Date: 2008-03-05 17:56:01
Message-ID: 1029.1204739761@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:35:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we need a FAQ entry on this at all, I'd stop after David's first
>> two sentences.

> Stopping there seems like a very bad idea from a public relations
> point of view.

Pointing to an alternative product doesn't make that any better.
What would make it better is to explain *why* we design PG this way.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2008-03-05 18:25:00
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-03-05 17:48:30
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group