Took me longer than necessary before I figured out which side the stuff
went on. So heres a quick example.
Would it be wise to have the plsql.sgml file renamed to plpgsql.sgml?
All of the internal tags are of the latter.
The other thing I noticed is that most of the quick examples in the file
use a para and synopsis. Is there a reason we're not using <example/> ?
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Joe Conway||Date: 2002-07-26 06:12:05|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: anonymous composite types for Table Functions|
|Previous:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2002-07-26 01:17:23|
|Subject: Re: COPY improvements|