Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: notification payloads

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: notification payloads
Date: 2007-04-03 17:45:42
Message-ID: 10271.1175622342@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> We'll also need to store the database id along with the event name and 
> message, since pg_listener is per db rather than per cluster.

Well, that's an artifact of the historical implementation ... does
anyone want to argue that LISTEN should be cluster-wide given the
opportunity?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2007-04-03 18:14:24
Subject: Re: notification payloads
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-03 17:40:56
Subject: Re: Questions about pid file creation code

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group