| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql \e broken again |
| Date: | 2004-11-14 19:28:55 |
| Message-ID: | 10243.1100460535@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The EDITOR variable seems to have a fairly standard meaning on Unix
> systems. I've been using that EDITOR value for years without problems,
> only when I use psql's \e once in a while it breaks. I don't think we
> should deviate from what seems to be a standard practice.
Agreed, no quotes on Unix. I'm just wondering what to do on Windows.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-14 19:36:05 | Re: A modest proposal: get rid of GUC's USERLIMIT |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-11-14 19:11:30 | Re: psql \e broken again |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Serguei Mokhov | 2004-11-14 23:42:19 | Translation updates for 8.0: pg_dump-ru, pgscripts-ru |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-11-14 19:11:30 | Re: psql \e broken again |