Individual subsystems' CVS tags?

From: Kristis Makris <kristis(dot)makris(at)datasoft(dot)com>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Individual subsystems' CVS tags?
Date: 2002-05-09 16:07:06
Message-ID: 1020960426.30031.61.camel@leonidas
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

This is more of a release management question/suggestion.

Are there any plans for tagging individual components in the CVS
repository with their own "private", if you will, tags ? For example, I
have found out that v7.01.00.08 of the ODBC driver is the most suitable
for the needs of an application I'm maintaining, since the behaviour of
both bugs in the application and driver produce the desired results. In
cases were minor improvements could be integrated, such as the append
feature of the log file, I would be interested in manually applying such
changes. Had there been a private tag with a name along the lines of
REL_7_1_2_ODBC_7_01_08 I could check out against it and privately
maintain a separate driver release that meets my needs.

I'd like to propose such a tagging scheme. I definitely do not have the
internals understanding required to judge whether such a process could
be carried out uniformly across different subsystems within postgres, or
comprehend the practical implications of maintaing such a process, but
it does seem like a useful thing to do in the ODBC driver's case. I
understand that going forward with such a scheme will not fix *my*
current problem, but others could be interested in such tags in the
future.

Thanks for any consideration in this.
Kristis

On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 18:36, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Kristis Makris <kristis(dot)makris(at)datasoft(dot)com> writes:
> > > -#define PG_BINARY_W "w"
> > > +#define PG_BINARY_W "a"
> >
> > Surely this would break a lot of other uses?
>
> Practically no. misc.c is the only place where
> PG_BINARY_W is used.
>
> > I don't object to writing logfiles in append mode... but the
> > PG_BINARY_x symbols probably shouldn't be used for logfiles
> > in the first place, and in any case we need to distinguish
> > "write" from "append" mode. I think a more extensive patch
> > that defines suitable PG_APPEND symbols may be called for.
>
> I would define PG_BINARY_A and change misc.c to use
> PG_BINARY_A.
>
> regards,
> Hiroshi Inoue
> http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-05-10 05:11:21 Re: Individual subsystems' CVS tags?
Previous Message Corey W. Gibbs 2002-05-09 14:47:24 Question about VB and Cursor Location