Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers
Date: 2002-05-02 15:00:42
Message-ID: 1020351642.32039.106.camel@taru.tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 15:48, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> > On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 05:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The temp schema is pg_temp_nnn where nnn is your BackendId (PROC array
> >> slot number). AFAIK there isn't any exported way to determine your
> >> BackendId from an SQL query.
>
> > The non-portable way on Linux RH 7.2 :
>
> >> create function getpid() returns int as '/lib/libc.so.6','getpid' language 'C';
>
> But PID is not BackendId.

Are you sure ?

I was assuming that BackendId was the process id of current backend
and that's what getpid() returns.

What is the Backend ID then ?

Is "PROC array slot number" something internal to postgres ?

-------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2002-05-02 15:32:57 Re: DROP TABLE hangs because of same table foreign key
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-02 14:54:44 Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey W. Baker 2002-05-02 15:43:23 Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-02 14:54:44 Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers