On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 06:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> John Gray <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > Patch attached in line with my previous statement on -hackers about
> > reorganisation of files in the commands directory. (Note that define.c
> > has been kept, holding some of the common support code for define
> > routines.)
> Patch applied.
> I believe you also had plans for refactoring the ALTER TABLE routines to
> eliminate duplicate coding?
I'd had some discussion with Christopher Kings-Lynne on this. He felt
(and it seemed a good idea) that we could do that once the file
rearrangement was done - I will be looking at that again over the next
couple of days.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2002-04-15 18:24:51|
|Subject: Re: Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour!|
|Previous:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2002-04-15 17:42:02|
|Subject: Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation |