Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Well, actually the btree_gist implementation for inet is a completely
>> broken piece of junk: it thinks that convert_network_to_scalar is 100%
>> trustworthy and can be used as a substitute for the real comparison
>> functions, which isn't even approximately true.
> Are you planning to fix this?
No. I don't understand why Teodor did it like that, so I'm not going
to try to change it. I'd be willing to take responsibility for ripping
out btree_gist's inet support altogether ...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Tipton||Date: 2010-10-19 22:43:53|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5716: Regression joining tables in UPDATE with
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-10-19 20:57:05|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5705: btree_gist: Index on inet changes query result|