On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 11:06, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> If someone is really bored out of their mind, at least one of these
> warnings can be gotten rid of by not using the -l option to flex. That
> might be desirable for other reasons, too, one of which is improved speed.
> No, just removing -l from the makefile is not the right fix.
I'm curious; why is this "not the right fix"? According to the manpage:
-l turns on maximum compatibility with the original
AT&T lex implementation. Note that this does not
mean full compatibility. Use of this option
costs a considerable amount of performance...
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2002-03-28 00:56:15|
|Subject: Re: compile bug in HEAD?|
|Previous:||From: Nicolas Bazin||Date: 2002-03-27 23:30:21|
|Subject: Always the same ecpg bug - please (re)apply patch|