On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 19:20, F Harvell wrote:
> I feel that the caching should be SQL transparent. If it is
> implemented reasonably well, the performance gain should be pretty
> much universal.
Well, the simple query cache scheme that is currently being proposed
would use a byte-by-byte comparison of the incoming query. I think the
consensus is that for a lot of workloads, this would be a bad idea.
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: mlw||Date: 2002-03-20 01:42:59|
|Subject: Re: Again, sorry, caching.|
|Previous:||From: F Harvell||Date: 2002-03-20 00:20:48|
|Subject: Re: Again, sorry, caching. |