Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Again, sorry, caching.

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: F Harvell <fharvell(at)fts(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Again, sorry, caching.
Date: 2002-03-20 01:28:19
Message-ID: 1016587699.22270.37.camel@jiro (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 19:20, F Harvell wrote:
> I feel that the caching should be SQL transparent.  If it is
> implemented reasonably well, the performance gain should be pretty
> much universal.

Well, the simple query cache scheme that is currently being proposed
would use a byte-by-byte comparison of the incoming query. I think the
consensus is that for a lot of workloads, this would be a bad idea.

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: mlwDate: 2002-03-20 01:42:59
Subject: Re: Again, sorry, caching.
Previous:From: F HarvellDate: 2002-03-20 00:20:48
Subject: Re: Again, sorry, caching.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group