Re: Again, sorry, caching.

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: F Harvell <fharvell(at)fts(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Again, sorry, caching.
Date: 2002-03-20 01:28:19
Message-ID: 1016587699.22270.37.camel@jiro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 19:20, F Harvell wrote:
> I feel that the caching should be SQL transparent. If it is
> implemented reasonably well, the performance gain should be pretty
> much universal.

Well, the simple query cache scheme that is currently being proposed
would use a byte-by-byte comparison of the incoming query. I think the
consensus is that for a lot of workloads, this would be a bad idea.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2002-03-20 01:42:59 Re: Again, sorry, caching.
Previous Message F Harvell 2002-03-20 00:20:48 Re: Again, sorry, caching.