| From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Paul Eggert <eggert(at)twinsun(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts |
| Date: | 2002-03-12 00:05:40 |
| Message-ID: | 1015891540.2119.36.camel@jiro |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 17:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > There is no cost to PostgreSQL in normal operation, since that part of
> > the source isn't affected at all. All that is affected is some of the
> > test scripts and documentation. I see little risk to incorporating
> > the patch, but of course it's your decision.
>
> We are kind of picky about adding complexity when it isn't required.
I wouldn't describe "standards compliance" as "complexity". I haven't
look at the patch extensively, but are there any areas where the new
behavior is not functionally identical to the old code, just more
standards compliant?
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-03-12 00:14:46 | Re: Domain Support -- another round |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-03-12 00:04:24 | Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts |