Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )

From: Alessio Bragadini <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )
Date: 2002-02-28 10:14:32
Message-ID: 1014891273.1649.351.camel@iris (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 06:44, Tom Lane wrote:

> Hmm.  I'd surely be the last to claim that CVS is the be-all and end-all
> of software archiving systems.  But is BitKeeper, or arch, or anything
> else enough better to justify the pain of switching?  This is intended
> as an honest question, not flamebait --- I haven't looked closely at
> the alternatives.

There was a discussion on Slashdot a couple of weeks ago, with (as
usual) some interesting comments out of the lot. It's at
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=27540&threshold=4&mode=flat
including comments from Subversion's Karl Fogel.

-- 
Alessio F. Bragadini		alessio(at)albourne(dot)com
APL Financial Services		http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus		 	phone: +357-22-755750

"It is more complicated than you think"
		-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2002-02-28 12:46:38
Subject: Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life
Previous:From: Miguel A. =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ar=E9valo?=Date: 2002-02-28 09:40:13
Subject: Clues about tables fileformat

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group