On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 06:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm. I'd surely be the last to claim that CVS is the be-all and end-all
> of software archiving systems. But is BitKeeper, or arch, or anything
> else enough better to justify the pain of switching? This is intended
> as an honest question, not flamebait --- I haven't looked closely at
> the alternatives.
There was a discussion on Slashdot a couple of weeks ago, with (as
usual) some interesting comments out of the lot. It's at
including comments from Subversion's Karl Fogel.
Alessio F. Bragadini alessio(at)albourne(dot)com
APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750
"It is more complicated than you think"
-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hannu Krosing||Date: 2002-02-28 12:46:38|
|Subject: Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life|
|Previous:||From: Miguel A. =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ar=E9valo?=||Date: 2002-02-28 09:40:13|
|Subject: Clues about tables fileformat|