Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-02-25 05:10:03
Message-ID: 1014613803.7682.118.camel@jiro (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 22:34, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> You have a good point with pg_dump.  Can I remove the use of the equals
> in there?  Seems safe to me.  However, it does prevent us from loading
> newer pgdumps into older database, which seems like a pain.

AFAIK, no effort is made to ensure that dump files produced by a current
version of pg_dump will restore properly into older databases. From what
I can tell, the odds of this happening successfully are slim to none...

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-02-25 05:35:02
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WAL Performance Improvements
Previous:From: Janardhana ReddyDate: 2002-02-25 05:09:16
Subject: WAL Performance Improvements

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-02-25 05:35:02
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WAL Performance Improvements
Previous:From: Janardhana ReddyDate: 2002-02-25 05:09:16
Subject: WAL Performance Improvements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group