Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steve <cheetah(at)tanabi(dot)org>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance
Date: 2007-04-12 23:32:43
Message-ID: 10117.1176420763@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-performance
Steve <cheetah(at)tanabi(dot)org> writes:
> ... even if I force it to use the indexes 
> (enable_seqscan=off) it doesn't make it any faster really :/

Does that change the plan, or do you still get a seqscan?

BTW, how big is this table really (how many rows)?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: SteveDate: 2007-04-12 23:40:15
Subject: Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-12 23:29:09
Subject: Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: SteveDate: 2007-04-12 23:40:15
Subject: Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-12 23:29:09
Subject: Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: SteveDate: 2007-04-12 23:40:15
Subject: Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-12 23:29:09
Subject: Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group