Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steve <cheetah(at)tanabi(dot)org>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance
Date: 2007-04-12 23:32:43
Message-ID: 10117.1176420763@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance

Steve <cheetah(at)tanabi(dot)org> writes:
> ... even if I force it to use the indexes
> (enable_seqscan=off) it doesn't make it any faster really :/

Does that change the plan, or do you still get a seqscan?

BTW, how big is this table really (how many rows)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve 2007-04-12 23:40:15 Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-12 23:29:09 Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve 2007-04-12 23:40:15 Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-12 23:29:09 Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve 2007-04-12 23:40:15 Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-12 23:29:09 Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance