Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Keepalives win32

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Keepalives win32
Date: 2010-06-30 14:48:18
Message-ID: 10084.1277909298@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 16:27, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> It's hard to argue about this when most of us have no idea what these
>> "system defaults" are, or whether they really are any different from the
>> RFC values in the first place, or whether ordinary users know how to
>> alter them or even find out their values. Please provide some
>> background if you want intelligent comments.

> The system defaults are whatever the user has configured at a machine
> level (by editing the registry, by hand or by tool (including
> policies)). I doubt many users have configured them by hand. There may
> well be tools that do it for them.

But you previously stated that this code was ignoring the registry
values.  So doesn't "system defaults" boil down to whatever Windows'
wired-in defaults are?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-06-30 14:52:57
Subject: Re: Keepalives win32
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-06-30 14:40:58
Subject: Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group