Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think you need to tweak that to get the number to be right-justified
>> not left-justified.
> Unless I'm missing something, I did that because the patch uses %10s
> not %-10s. No?
Oh, you're right, I was misremembering which direction that went.
Sorry for the noise.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2012-03-29 03:43:42|
|Subject: Re: patch for parallel pg_dump|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-03-29 02:39:33|
|Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) |
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2012-03-29 03:24:59|
|Subject: pgsql: Remove now redundant pgpipe code.|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2012-03-29 02:33:04|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_test_timing utility, to
measure clock monotonicity and timing|