Re: CommitFest rules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CommitFest rules
Date: 2008-07-10 14:16:48
Message-ID: 1002.1215699408@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 21:56:34 Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Right now you advance the static link to the next commit fest once the
>> current one starts --- I was hoping for a link that advances when the
>> commit fest is done so I could make it a permanent tab in Firefox.

> This is what I had proposed/changed, but see up thread where Tom disagreed
> with this idea.

I surely do not have an objection to having a link defined as above ---
I just wanted to be clear on what we meant by "current commitfest".
We probably need two separate terms for "the place to submit new
patches" and "the place we are trying to commit patches from".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2008-07-10 14:18:28 Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2008-07-10 13:38:37 Re: review: table function support