-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Tom Lane wrote:
> Uh, who exactly agreed to that?  I know when I do \df it's generally
> to check out built-in functions not my own.  I don't see this as an
> improvement.

Quoting Tom Lane:
> I thought the "S" suggestion was much better than this.
>
> Personally I am not unhappy with the existing behavior, because (unlike
> Greg I guess) I use \df and \do to look at system definitions all the
> time.  However I'm willing to accept \dfS on the grounds of symmetry
> with the behavior for tables.  I don't really want to put up with a less
> convenient behavior *and* a gratuitously different syntax.

http://makeashorterlink.com/?H1FC12BCA [Google groups]

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200504010705
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCTTlivJuQZxSWSsgRAn7MAJ4ntKAaoWfg02iNzGxaenwkTcQTvACgnAxM
w5eM8PTJ7G40CezTkBmS/DM=
=D7yf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

• Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments at 2005-04-01 04:34:02 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments at 2005-04-04 00:59:21 from Jim C. Nasby

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira	Date: 2005-04-01 12:29:32
	Subject: Re: Issue Tracking System (was add_missing_from in 8.1)
Previous:	From: Richard Huxton	Date: 2005-04-01 12:04:22
	Subject: Re: Name change proposal

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Ed L.	Date: 2005-04-01 16:26:44
	Subject: query planner rewrite
Previous:	From: Neil Conway	Date: 2005-04-01 08:41:41
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib/pg_buffercache