Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)

From: "Chad Thompson" <chad(at)weblinkservices(dot)com>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,"pgsql-performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
Date: 2003-05-02 20:53:33
Message-ID: 0c9a01c310ec$e5605d90$32021aac@chad (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Can WAL and the swap partition be on the same drive?

Thanks
Chad
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Chad Thompson" <chad(at)weblinkservices(dot)com>; "pgsql-performance"
<pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)


Chad,

> I realize that Im a raid on linux newbie so any suggestions are
appreciated.
> Im thinking I want to put this on an IDE Raid array, probably 0+1. IDE
seems
> to be cheap and effective these days.
> What ive been able to glean from other postings is that I should have 3
> drives, 2 for the database w/ striping and another for the WAL.

Well, RAID 0+1 is only relevant if you have more than 2 drives.  Otherwise,
it's just RAID 1 (which is a good choice for PostgreSQL).

More disks is almost always better.  Putting WAL on a seperate (non-RAID)
disk
is usually a very good idea.

> I would also appreciate raid hardware suggestions (brands, etc)
> And as always im not afraid to RTFM if someone can point me to the FM :-)

Use Linux Software RAID.    To get hardware RAID better than Linux Software
RAID, you have to spend $800 or more.


--
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: scott.marloweDate: 2003-05-02 21:20:56
Subject: Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-05-02 20:10:46
Subject: Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group