Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Another notify question

From: Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-general(at)dynworks(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Another notify question
Date: 2002-03-25 08:23:55
Message-ID: 0GTI00DPSSUX7W@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
> Well, I definitely wasn't advocating that.  IMHO you should be
> guaranteed the delivery of *some* notification, but possibly one
> containing less information than what was sent.  Or you might get
> a notification when in fact none was sent.  This should be okay
> for ordinary uses of NOTIFY, as long as such cases are infrequent
> (so that you don't waste many cycles checking for events that
> didn't happen).
 Ok, that's good. Under what circumstances might I recieve less information? 
I assume that the information might be truncated from the text argument, but 
could you clarify?

Thanks,
	Jeff

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Heiko KleinDate: 2002-03-25 09:47:42
Subject: Re: ODBC problem
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-03-25 08:07:00
Subject: Re: PL/pgsql locking policy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group