plpython3
| From: |
James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name> |
| To: |
PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: |
plpython3 |
| Date: |
2009-11-20 00:41:30 |
| Message-ID: |
0F68B683-A745-4FCA-8697-11F7A420ACFB@jwp.name (view raw or flat) |
| Thread: |
|
| Lists: |
pgsql-hackers |
Here's my latest patch. I'm going to submit to the open commitfest. (hrm, it's 189K compressed, should I just let people use git in the future?)
Known issues:
- Documentation has gaps.
- Code formatting/ws is not consistent with PG's.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Excepting trusted and DB-API, this patch fulfills all of the current PL/Python TODOs for Python 3, and adds *many* new features(See the documentation, and the WIP wiki page).
plpython3 is intentionally incompatible with plpython as Python 3 is intentionally incompatible with Python 2. Be sure to see the recent discussion in the other Python 3 thread[1]. =)
New Docs:
http://python.projects.postgresql.org/pldocs/plpython3.html
Overview:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/WIP:plpython3
git(plpython3 branch):
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=plpython3.git;a=summary
Past threads on the subject:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg01376.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg01519.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg01505.php
[1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-11/msg00547.php
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Emmanuel Cecchet | Date: 2009-11-20 00:54:30 |
| Subject: Re: Union test case broken in make check? |
| Previous: | From: u235sentinel | Date: 2009-11-20 00:15:05 |
| Subject: plruby code and postgres ? |