| From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
| Date: | 2006-08-04 01:05:39 |
| Message-ID: | 0C6AD0FD-2D94-4916-943A-8A1D8C49816B@seespotcode.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Aug 4, 2006, at 9:42 , Gavin Sherry wrote:
> ... with update? I associate it very closely with INSERT. After all,
> INSERT is the only statement where we've had VALUES as part of the
> grammar.
Of course! Thanks for catching the glitch. I must have a bad RAM chip.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-04 01:21:47 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-08-04 00:52:12 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-04 01:21:47 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-08-04 00:52:12 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-04 01:21:47 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-08-04 00:52:12 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |