Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Multiple logical databases

From: Rick Gigger <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>
To: Chris Campbell <chris(at)bignerdranch(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multiple logical databases
Date: 2006-02-03 17:43:38
Message-ID: 0C302E10-608C-4233-94DE-91C0F85FE7AB@alpinenetworking.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Feb 3, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Chris Campbell wrote:

> On Feb 3, 2006, at 08:05, Mark Woodward wrote:
>
>> Using the "/etc/hosts" file or DNS to maintain host locations for  
>> is a
>> fairly common and well known practice, but there is no such  
>> mechanism for
>> "ports." The problem now becomes a code issue, not a system  
>> administration
>> issue.
>
> What if you assigned multiple IPs to a machine, then used ipfw (or  
> something) to forward connections to port 5432 for each IP to the  
> proper IP and port?

If he had multiple ips couldn't he just make them all listen only on  
one specific ip (instead of '*') and just use the default port?

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Chris CampbellDate: 2006-02-03 17:44:00
Subject: Re: Multiple logical databases
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-03 17:27:26
Subject: Re: Passing arguments to views

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Chris CampbellDate: 2006-02-03 17:44:00
Subject: Re: Multiple logical databases
Previous:From: Andrew KlostermanDate: 2006-02-03 16:15:41
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in ecpg and psql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group