Re: guid/uuid datatype

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Date: 2007-01-26 04:52:56
Message-ID: 0A8B5CA8-06DF-417E-97E2-967258350CA4@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I suggest that you read the discussion in the tsearch thread about
> figuring out how to make contrib modules more attractive. I don't see
> a reason why uuid has to be in the core, but I do see that there needs
> to be some centrally organized consolidation of the various existing
> attempts under a label of officiality.

Following that logic we should remove all data types that aren't
specified in ANSI.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-01-26 08:01:53 Re: guid/uuid datatype
Previous Message Jeremy Drake 2007-01-26 01:48:37 Re: [HACKERS] unprivileged pl install