Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: guid/uuid datatype

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Date: 2007-01-26 04:52:56
Message-ID: 0A8B5CA8-06DF-417E-97E2-967258350CA4@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I suggest that you read the discussion in the tsearch thread about
> figuring out how to make contrib modules more attractive.  I don't see
> a reason why uuid has to be in the core, but I do see that there needs
> to be some centrally organized consolidation of the various existing
> attempts under a label of officiality.

Following that logic we should remove all data types that aren't  
specified in ANSI.
--
Jim Nasby                                            jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)



In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-01-26 08:01:53
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Previous:From: Jeremy DrakeDate: 2007-01-26 01:48:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] unprivileged pl install

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group