From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |
Date: | 2012-04-18 03:07:58 |
Message-ID: | 072bd4695d133303113fd958c3a187cc@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> But for any
> given ABC there are also people who will tell you that it's got
> significant problems. We don't need to change anything to get a
> system that's got significant problems; we already have one.
Let's not let perfect be the enemy of good. In this case, *anything*
that actually tracks bugs (and they are all quite good at that,
if nothing else) is an improvement over what we have now, and thus,
quite good. :)
Personally, I'm okay with, and have extensively hacked on, Bugzilla
and RT, but anything should be fine as long as we have someone
to take ownership.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204172131
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAk+OL/0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSshMxACeJdr+WO4ttA2mkrGLv98PTTSH
jSoAniKwQNPzokA3f0GYN8gB+hAOc0Hy
=oPn6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Qi Huang | 2012-04-18 03:11:57 | Re: Gsoc2012 idea, tablesample |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-18 02:53:44 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positional argumen |