Re: Bug tracker tool we need

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Date: 2012-04-18 03:07:58
Message-ID: 072bd4695d133303113fd958c3a187cc@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> But for any
> given ABC there are also people who will tell you that it's got
> significant problems. We don't need to change anything to get a
> system that's got significant problems; we already have one.

Let's not let perfect be the enemy of good. In this case, *anything*
that actually tracks bugs (and they are all quite good at that,
if nothing else) is an improvement over what we have now, and thus,
quite good. :)

Personally, I'm okay with, and have extensively hacked on, Bugzilla
and RT, but anything should be fine as long as we have someone
to take ownership.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204172131
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk+OL/0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSshMxACeJdr+WO4ttA2mkrGLv98PTTSH
jSoAniKwQNPzokA3f0GYN8gB+hAOc0Hy
=oPn6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qi Huang 2012-04-18 03:11:57 Re: Gsoc2012 idea, tablesample
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-04-18 02:53:44 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positional argumen