On Mar 20, 2011, at 2:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
>> <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Not really a performance issue AFAICS. If the relcache init file exists,
>>> then the phase2 of the catalog cache which eventually calls the above code
>>> path is avoided.
>> Oh, that doesn't sound so bad, then.
> I want to take a closer look at this one because I thought I'd covered
> all those issues in the last go-round.
Go for it.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Yeb Havinga||Date: 2011-03-20 15:03:04|
|Subject: Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19|
|Previous:||From: Nicolas Barbier||Date: 2011-03-20 10:11:09|
|Subject: Re: I am confused after reading codes of PostgreSQL three week|