Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: VACUUM FULL deadlock with backend startup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL deadlock with backend startup
Date: 2011-03-20 11:58:32
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mar 20, 2011, at 2:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
>> <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Not really a performance issue AFAICS. If the relcache init file exists,
>>> then the phase2 of the catalog cache which eventually calls the above code
>>> path is avoided.
>> Oh, that doesn't sound so bad, then.
> I want to take a closer look at this one because I thought I'd covered
> all those issues in the last go-round.

Go for it.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Yeb HavingaDate: 2011-03-20 15:03:04
Subject: Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19
Previous:From: Nicolas BarbierDate: 2011-03-20 10:11:09
Subject: Re: I am confused after reading codes of PostgreSQL three week

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group