Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Ron Johnson" <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>,"PgSQL Performance ML" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance
Date: 2003-08-29 01:40:18
Message-ID: 06e801c36dce$81a153b0$2800a8c0@mars (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
> > As with all performance tests/benchmarks, there are probably dozens or
> > more reasons why these results aren't as accurate or wonderful as they
> > should be.  Take them for what they are and hopefully everyone can
> > learn a few things from them.
> >
> > Intelligent feedback is welcome.
> >
> > http://www.potentialtech.com/wmoran/postgresql.php
>
> I notice that the Linux FSs weren't tested with noatime.  Any
> reason?

My friend, (a FreeBSD committer), was wondering what the results are if you
turn off softupdates (to match Linux default installation) and use noatime.
He also wonders how bug the default IO is?

Chris


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-08-29 01:59:50
Subject: Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance tests
Previous:From: Bill MoranDate: 2003-08-29 01:19:05
Subject: Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group