Re: [PORTS] QNX4

The QNX4 port is OK now.

But there are still some minor problems which I have already reported:

1)
> I had now problems to compile the plperl stuff. These problems are new.
> They occur because my precompiled perl package has been made with cc and
> plperl can be compiled with gcc only on QNX (due to long long int). The
CC,
> CFLAGS and so on are got from the prebuilt perl stuff. gcc doesn't work
with
> the cc options. So, to get CC, CFLAGS and so on from the perl installation
> not seems to be such a good idea in this situation.

This doesn't matter on QNX4 since shared libraries are not supported.

2)
> rules failes now too. This is new.
> ERROR: Bad money external representation

I believe I have seen this already in a report from another platform. So it
might be not QNX specific.

IMHO you can count QNX as supported. A patch for an updated FAQ_QNX4 is
attached.

Andreas

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
An: Kardos, Dr. Andreas <kardos(at)repas-aeg(dot)de>
Cc: <pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Gesendet: Montag, 3. April 2000 06:00
Betreff: Re: [PORTS] QNX4

> > > > Furthermore this port is not mentioned yet in the current
documentation.
> > > It is mentioned in ports.sgml, and should show up on the daily html
> > > snapshots. Where else do you find mention of ports? We'll make sure it
> > > is added in...
> > OK, I thought the htm files which I have got from CVS are up-to-date...
> > Since the QNX4 port is fully integreted in 7.0 it does not require a
patch
> > any more.
>
> I just recalled this posting from a while ago. Dr. Kardos, do the most
> recent changes to config.guess finish fixing the problems, or did it
> introduce a few more things which need to be fixed up?
>
> I'll count QNX as supported unless you think I shouldn't.
>
> - Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
> South Pasadena, California
>