Re: [HACKERS] Trouble with COPY IN

From: James William Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com>, Samuel Gendler <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Trouble with COPY IN
Date: 2010-08-28 18:37:38
Message-ID: 060ADB72-80CA-4593-A333-DF2FD6BB0C2E@jwp.name
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On Aug 9, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Kris Jurka wrote:
> Oh, duh. It's a server side copy not going through the client at all. Here's a hopefully final patch.

Trying it out... Works for me.

I understand the resistance to the patch, but it would be
quite nice to see this wart in the rear view. =\

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-28 20:11:10 Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2010-08-28 18:33:40 Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pif 2010-08-31 15:50:47 JDBC: "transaction aborted"
Previous Message Lew 2010-08-22 15:38:36 Re: uuid values as parameters