Re: PostgreSQL Benchmarks

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Benchmarks
Date: 2003-02-11 14:36:40
Message-ID: 05dc8333c30f9e46282486f13f6b968b@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Hrm. I just saw that the PHP ADODB guy just published a bunch of database
> benchmarks. It's fairly evident to me that benchmarking PostgreSQL on
> Win32 isn't really fair:
>
> http://php.weblogs.com/oracle_mysql_performance

Is there anyone here that can contact them and get more details about
how the test was run? Even on Windows, I don't beleive that Postgres
should be quite as slow as indicated. I'd rather someone more familiar
with Windows than I take a stab at it.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200302110934

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+SQoFvJuQZxSWSsgRAi5jAJ4li+qUDlxzM1r0XLZAjDlW1oA1ZwCgiOpT
0LgCKy9W5vG0nNcYWNJGkPM=
=Rrw5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Copeland 2003-02-11 14:39:38 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Benchmarks
Previous Message Mario Weilguni 2003-02-11 14:31:06 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Benchmarks

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2003-02-11 14:38:53 Re: log_duration
Previous Message Mario Weilguni 2003-02-11 14:31:06 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Benchmarks