Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database

Thanks for that Tim. Could I please ask everyone else though if the silence
means "of course it's fine in a production environment" or "I wouldn't dream
of even considering it". If you think it doesn't make for an interesting discusion
mail me directly. Many thanks.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Finch, FosterFinch Ltd" <tim(at)fosterfinch(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Steve Slatcher" <steve_slatcher(at)scientia(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database

> I have no experience of production systems on Windows but I noted somewhere
> in this column recently someone ran into a 62 concurrent session maximum
> down to some bug or limit in Cygwin, which you might want to look into, if
> you expect high simultaneous hit rate onto the postmaster...
>
> At 11:28 05/04/2002 +0100, Steve Slatcher wrote:
> >Hi all
> >
> >Would anyone share experiences and/or thoughts about the use of PostgreSQL
> >on Cygwin in a production environment ? Leaving aside, for now at least,
> >why I
> >would want to do it!
> >
> >I am aware that it does not install as Windows sysadmins might expect, but
> >was wondering about issues like performace and reliability cf other platforms.
> >
> >Steve Slatcher
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> >subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> >message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
> Tim Finch,
> FosterFinch Ltd
> http://www.fosterfinch.co.uk
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>