| From: | "Jonathan Blitz" <jb(at)anykey(dot)co(dot)il> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Tim Jones'" <TJones(at)optio(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: slow query using sub select |
| Date: | 2006-05-23 00:33:09 |
| Message-ID: | 04e401c67e00$79648b50$ddf71005@jonathanlaptop |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Jones [mailto:TJones(at)optio(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 12:11 AM
> To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [PERFORM] slow query using sub select
>
> Hi,
> I am having a problem with a sub select query being kinda slow. The
> query is as follows:
>
> select batterycode, batterydescription, observationdate from Battery t1
> where patientidentifier=611802158 and observationdate = (select
> max(observationdate) from Battery t2 where t2.batterycode=t1.batterycode
> and patientidentifier=611802158) order by batterydescription.
How about changing it into a standard join:
select t1.batterycode, t1.batterydescription, t2.observationdate
from Battery t1,
(Select batterycode ,max(observationdate) from Battery t2 where
patientidentifier=611802158 group by batterycode) AS T2
where t1. batterycode = t2. batterycode
Jonathan Blitz
AnyKey Limited
Israel
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.6.1/344 - Release Date: 05/19/2006
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Antonio Batovanja | 2006-05-23 07:10:29 | Re: Query performance |
| Previous Message | Steinar H. Gunderson | 2006-05-22 23:33:33 | Re: Query performance |