> > You should note that someone already has sent in a patch for
> > hasn't been acted on though - can't quite remember why. Maybe we should
> > resurrect it...
> It's been awhile, but my recollection is that the patch had restricted
> functionality (which would be okay for a first cut) and it invented SQL
> syntax that seemed to lock us into that restricted functionality
> permanently (not so okay). Details are fuzzy though...
Well, I'll resurrect it and see if it can be improved. Tablespaces seem to
be a requested feature these days...
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Catalin||Date: 2003-02-27 12:19:23|
|Subject: Daily crash|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-02-27 07:30:43|
|Subject: Re: OIDs as keys |
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Lee Kindness||Date: 2003-02-27 09:08:19|
|Subject: Re: ecpg in REL7_3_2|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-02-27 06:56:49|
|Subject: Re: Index File growing big. |