Re: [PATCH] Addition of some trivial auto vacuum logging

From: Royce Ausburn <royce(dot)ml(at)inomial(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Addition of some trivial auto vacuum logging
Date: 2011-09-28 00:28:26
Message-ID: 04177E69-79D4-44B8-A3BD-94348ACADE2B@inomial.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks for the tips guys.

Just a question: is the utility great enough to warrant me working further on this? I have no real desire to implement this particular feature -- I simply saw an opportunity to cut my teeth on something easy. I'd be happy to find something on the TODO list instead if this feature isn't really worthwhile.

Tom's suggestion looks like it's less trivial that I can do just yet, but I'll take a look and ask for help if I need it.

Cheers!

--Royce

On 28/09/2011, at 4:42 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:

> Royce Ausburn <royce(dot)ml(at)inomial(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> As this is my first patch to postgresql, I'm expecting I've done
> < something wrong. Please if you want me to fix something up, or
>> just go away please say so ;) I appreciate that this is a trivial
>> patch, and perhaps doesn't add value except for my very specific
>> use case* feel free to ignore it =)
>
> Thanks for offering this to the community. I see you've already
> gotten feedback on the patch, with a suggestion for a different
> approach. Don't let that discourage you -- very few patches get in
> without needing to be modified based on review and feedback.
>
> If you haven't already done so, please review this page and its
> links:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/developer/
>
> Of particular interest is the Developer FAQ:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ
>
> You should also be aware of the development cycle, which (when not
> in feature freeze for beta testing) involves alternating periods of
> focused development and code review (the latter called CommitFests):
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest
>
> We are now in the midst of a CF, so it would be great if you could
> join in that as a reviewer. Newly submitted patches should be
> submitted to the "open" CF:
>
> http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
>
> You might want to consider what Tom said and submit a modified patch
> for the next review cycle.
>
> Welcome!
>
> -Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2011-09-28 00:36:29 Re: [PATCH] Addition of some trivial auto vacuum logging
Previous Message Will Leinweber 2011-09-27 23:57:52 feature request: auto savepoint for interactive psql when in transaction.