> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Meskes [mailto:meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> Sent: 10 September 2002 20:42
> To: PostgreSQL Interfaces; PostgreSQL Hacker
> Subject: [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question
> I was just contacted by a customer about the
> SQLProcedureColumns call in our odbc driver. It appears this
> call is undefined in the standard odbc driver but is
> available in odbcplus. Could anyone please enlighten me why
> this was forked and not merged into one driver? Is there a
> problem when I take the odbcplus code and put it into the
> odbc driver?
There are currently 3 variants of the driver.
PostgreSQL - This is the current ODBC 2.5 compliant driver.
PostgreSQL+ - This is a development version that is ODBC 3.0 compliant.
PostgreSQL+ Unicode - This is PostgreSQL+ with Unicode support.
We are aiming for PostgreSQL+ Unicode to be the only driver as soon as
possible, but due to the way ODBC3 and Unicode support were added (ie.
quickly, to solve immediate problems), we (Hiroshi & I) felt it was best
to keep them seperate until we were sure of their reliability.
Currently, PostgreSQL+ seems pretty good as, does the Unicode version,
though that is still missing some features iirc.
HTH, Regards, Dave.
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: snpe||Date: 2002-09-10 20:49:38|
|Subject: Re: [JDBC] problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-09-10 20:00:26|
|Subject: Re: [JDBC] problem with new autocommit config parameter and|
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Iavor Raytchev||Date: 2002-09-12 08:46:07|
|Previous:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2002-09-10 19:42:23|
|Subject: ODBC problem/question|