Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgresql.org search engine.

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql.org search engine.
Date: 2004-01-30 20:57:07
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87206B4@mail.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org] 
> Sent: 30 January 2004 20:49
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Oleg Bartunov; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Postgresql.org search engine.
> 
> 'k, this is how the search engines should see each message when they
> index:
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-01/msg00745t.php
> 
> anything else you'd like me to strip out of there? :(
> 
> Note that this is not with the <!--noindex--> stuff you were 
> talking about, which, from what you've said, I'm not sure is 
> useful, since not all search engines will recognize it ... 
> with the way its coded now, as long as I have the search 
> engine listed, the output will look the same ...

As I pointed out before, the problem with that is that search engines
like Google or search.postgresql.org that cache the pages won't get any
of the thread navigation and other elements of the page.

I'd rather see the <!--noindex--> bits (or at very least, include them
as well and don't look for aspseek or googlebot in showit()).

Regards, Dave.

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-01-30 20:59:22
Subject: Re: Postgresql.org search engine.
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-01-30 20:53:35
Subject: Re: Postgresql.org search engine.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group