| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "elein" <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Steve Simms" <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bricolage: Impressive |
| Date: | 2004-01-19 08:23:12 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87204DE@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elein [mailto:elein(at)varlena(dot)com]
> Sent: 19 January 2004 03:01
> To: Josh Berkus
> Cc: Robert Treat; Steve Simms; PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Bricolage: Impressive
>
>
> as well as a Wiki (which I also believe
> we should have).
I'm fascinated by the current trend towards Wikis - what do they achieve
that user comments don't other than potentially allowing a malicious
user to cause havoc and potentially open the site to all sorts of legal
problems should something libelous be posted - something I kindof
expected you .usians to be particularly wary of?
With a system like Bricolage in place, surely we can allow enough
trusted people to be editors/publishers that we needn't allow any old
Tom, Dick or Harry (no offense Tom :-) ) to edit whatever they see fit,
but merely to add comments instead?
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | World Wide Web Owner | 2004-01-19 09:19:07 | New News Entry |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-19 06:29:54 | Re: Bricolage: Impressive |