Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Jim Hines" <jhines(at)wdtv(dot)com>, <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?
Date: 2003-04-03 19:07:21
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259EF5@mail.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-support

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Hines [mailto:jhines(at)wdtv(dot)com] 
> Sent: 03 April 2003 20:05
> To: Dave Page; pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin 
> Not a good combo?
> 
> 
> On Thursday 03 April 2003 01:47 pm, Dave Page wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > This is a bug caused by a very long string in the RedHat build of 
> > PostgreSQL that overflows a buff in the ODBC driver.
> >
> > Please try the snapshot driver from 
> > http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
> 
> If I would remove the Redhat build and put in the RPMs from 
> the Postgresql.org 
> site, would that fix this issue as well?

Depends if they were built on Redhat 9 because the error comes from the
long gcc version string that PostgreSQL includes in it's version string.

Regards, Dave.


Responses

pgadmin-support by date

Next:From: Jim HinesDate: 2003-04-03 19:21:43
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?
Previous:From: Jim HinesDate: 2003-04-03 19:05:17
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.3/RH 9/PGAdmin Not a good combo?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group