| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "frank_lupo" <frank_lupo(at)email(dot)it>, "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: reindex action |
| Date: | 2003-03-06 09:22:03 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259D13@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: frank_lupo [mailto:frank_lupo(at)email(dot)it]
> Sent: 05 March 2003 21:13
> To: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] reindex action
>
>
> I developed a reindex command (table,index no database).
Sorry Frank - this breaks the OO design of pgSchema. Unless there are
exceptional circumstances, anything that occurs to an object should be
implemented as a method of that object, so I would expect to see methods
like:
pgIndex.ReIndex()
pgDatabase.ReIndex()
pgTable.ReIndex()
Can you recode it in that fashion please?
Thanks, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | efesar | 2003-03-06 10:35:01 | Re: PGAdmin 3 Patch // Memory Leaks Fixed // Ignore last patch |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-03-06 09:18:40 | Re: PGAdmin 3 Patch // Memory Leaks Fixed // Ignore last patch |