Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 Powerfail testing

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 Powerfail testing
Date: 2003-03-05 12:32:12
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259D03@mail.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp] 
> Sent: 05 March 2003 02:23
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [HACKERS] Win32 Powerfail testing
>
> So far we found interesting facts. Our Win32 port passes his 
> test in most cases. However if power of the machine is turned 
> off right after (10 to 20 seconds) the Checkpoint has been 
> made, it does not passes his test. So we are thinking that 
> there is someting wrong with the checkpoint implementaion for 
> Win32 port, which is essentially same as Jan's 
> implementation. i.e. using _flushall() instead of sync().  We 
> were looking for a fix or an alternative implementaion of 
> sync() without success.

Hi Tatsuo,

Does this help:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;66052

Regards, Dave.

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2003-03-05 13:15:53
Subject: Re: XML ouput for psql
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2003-03-05 06:00:47
Subject: test to be ignored ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group