Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: int types migrated one level lower

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Reshat Sabiq" <sabiq(at)purdue(dot)edu>,<pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: int types migrated one level lower
Date: 2002-12-29 21:39:42
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128DF0@mail.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-support

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reshat Sabiq [mailto:sabiq(at)purdue(dot)edu] 
> Sent: 29 December 2002 21:34
> To: Dave Page; pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] int types migrated one level lower
> 
> 
> What I meant to say is that there is nothing wrong with 
> either ADO's, or pgAdmin's mappings. The problem arises from 
> the fact that MS Access has a "downward-revised" mapping of 
> integer types: byte - 8 bits (this one is fine) integer - 16 
> bits (i.e., int2, but normally should be int4) long integer - 
> 32 bits (i.e., int4, but normally should be int8)

Ahh, I see. Thanks for clarifying what you meant.

Regards, Dave.

pgadmin-support by date

Next:From: Cheryl ThompsonDate: 2002-12-31 22:05:20
Subject: Can't see any tables??
Previous:From: Reshat SabiqDate: 2002-12-29 21:34:28
Subject: Re: int types migrated one level lower

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group