Re: ODBC changes

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ODBC changes
Date: 2002-11-28 08:33:12
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128C92@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp]
> Sent: 28 November 2002 01:42
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: ODBC changes
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > Hi Hiroshi,
> >
> > Couple of questions:
> >
> > 1) Now seems the ideal time for 07.03.0001. Do you agree?
>
> I don't object to it.
>
> > 2) Is the ODBC3 driver ready to become the main one yet?
> > I've not seen many bug reports
>
> I'm not sure how many people are using the ODBC3 driver.

No, neither do I - it seems unlikely that we'll ever find out though
unless we take the plunge.

We know that 07.02.0004 is pretty good, so what about dropping the 2,5
version now, and if people have major problems then they can revert to
that version until the ODBC3 one is fixed. Otherwise, we'll never know
if it's ready.

How does that sound?

>
> > - or for the Unicode one for that matter.
>
> I know an application which doesn't work with the Unicode driver.

OK, we can leave that one labelled as Beta.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2002-11-28 08:40:19 Re: Can't get more than 255 chars out of memo field in Acc
Previous Message Han 2002-11-28 08:11:50 Re: Problem about Bytea and SQL_C_CHAR