Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger
Date: 2010-11-04 20:28:37
Message-ID: 03ADD7F8-64F0-4C37-B7DE-B88A5F28438A@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Nov 4, 2010, at 4:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On ons, 2010-11-03 at 14:15 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> /me wants a global $dbh that mimics the DBI interface but just uses
>> SPI under the hood. Not volunteering, either…
> 
> Already exists: DBD::PgSPI.  Probably needs lots of updating through.

Funny I never noticed that before. I couldn't get it to build, of course. And it looks a bit heavy, relying on DBD::Pg. Seems like it'd be easier to write something that just uses SPI and emulates the DBI interface, IMHO.

Best,

David



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2010-11-04 20:29:49
Subject: Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-11-04 20:15:58
Subject: Re: lazy snapshots?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group