Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks

From: "Cestmir Hybl" <cestmirl(at)freeside(dot)sk>
To: "Paul Thomas" <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>,"Nick Barr" <nicky(at)chuckie(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Date: 2004-04-21 13:31:02
Message-ID: 037701c427a4$e41a38a0$0200a8c0@stratos (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
> Looks like he's using the default postgresql.conf settings in which case
> I'm not suprised at pg looking so slow.

The question also is, IMHO, why the hell, postgreSQL still comes out of the
box with so stupid configuration defaults, totally underestimated for todays
average hardware configuration (1+GHz, 0.5+GB RAM, fast FSB, fast HDD).

It seems to me better strategy to force that 1% of users to "downgrade" cfg.
than vice-versa.

regards
ch


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Paul ThomasDate: 2004-04-21 14:08:09
Subject: Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Previous:From: Paul ThomasDate: 2004-04-21 12:55:21
Subject: Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group