Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Removing some of the old VC++ stuff

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removing some of the old VC++ stuff
Date: 2007-03-01 23:44:56
Message-ID: 035d01c75c5b$9df113f0$c701a8c0@wiseknot.local (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi.

Yeah, as for me, it is already mutual agreement.:-)
Everyone will be able to use it easily. It is important in the meaning that avoids 
useless confusion. Moreover, the DEBUG function of VS2005 is very excellent.
I think great evolution of it.  Thanks!!

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

> I would like to suggest that we retire some of the old Visual C++ build
> infrastructure. Specifically, all the makefiles for VC++ 6.0 *except* libpq.
> 
> There is a point for keeping libpq - if you want to build a static
> version, it's easier if you can use the same version. And it's also
> required if you want to be able to use the PQtrace function. Therefor, I
> suggest that we keep both the VC++ and Borland makefiles for libpq
> (since we do seem to have someone touching the Borland stuff every now
> and then we can keep it, but I wouldn't consider it "properly
> maintained" :-P)
> 
> 
> The argument for removing the rest of the support is that it will get us
> away from having to maintain it :-) The build files can be generated
> automatically for Visual C++ 2005 using the new code (and you can build
> just the frontend part sif you want to), which is available as a free
> download from MS.
> 
> Anybody think we need to keep those around?
> 
> //Magnus
>


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2007-03-01 23:56:56
Subject: Re: SOC & user quotas
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-03-01 22:53:08
Subject: Re: SOC & user quotas

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group